A Comparative study of didactic teachings in Bahram Chubineh and Shakespeare's Macbeth

Document Type : Original Research

Author
roohollah roozbeh
vali-e- Asr University of Rafsanjan
Abstract
Ferdowsi and Shakespeare in their works deal with didactic teachings. Both poets mirror nature and consider human happiness depending on respect for the moral virtues, and strive to strengthen the teaching and ethos of moral points. Shakespeare has used every opportunity to express the teachings of education. In all its tragedies he has used elements of education. Shakespeare’s human outlook towards ethical issues is clear. Some of these teachings are expressed through the plots and characters on different occasions. This paper studies the result of moral values and its educational functions. The most important doctrine of education in the ّFerdowsy and Shakespeare is condemnation of avarice and ambitions. Macbeth is a Scottish captain who kills the king in order to usurp the throne. Shakespeare shows the result of greed is the destruction of soul and its good qualities. In the end, the victory is with the good in the duality of good and evil. Both deal with two commanders who rebel against kings and bring about their own fall. Both are told by supernatural forces that they are destined to rule. their difference is that Bahram is a good commander while Macbeth turns evil.

Keywords

Subjects

منابع
کتابها
. زرین‌کوب، عبدالحسین. (1364). تاریخ مردم ایران. تهران: امیر کبیر.
. Abrams, Meyer Howard, and Geoffrey Harpham (2009). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Cengage Learning.
4. Bradely, Andrew Cecil.(1992) Shakespearean Tragedy. 3rd ed. London: Macmillan.
5. Hall, Vernon.(1963) A Short History of Literary Criticism. New York University Press.
6.Lei, Bi-qi Beatrice, Judy Celine Ick, and Poonam Trivedi,(2016) eds. Shakespeare’s Asian Journeys: Critical Encounters, Cultural Geographies, and the Politics of Travel. Vol. 19. Taylor & Francis.
7. Knight, George Wilson.(1949) The Wheel of Fire; Explorations. New York: Routledge.
8. Muir, Kenneth.(1985) The Arden Shakespeare: Macbeth. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.
9. Shakespeare, William.(1976) The Arden Shakespeare: Macbeth. India: B. I. Publications Pvt. Ltd. by arrangement with Methuen and Co. Ltd.
10. Traversi, Derek Antona.(1969) An Approach to Shakespeare. Australia: Double Day.
مقالات
11. حسان، عبدالحکیم. (1983م) «الادب المقارن بین المفهومین الفرنسی و الامریکی» فصول، القاهره، جزء 1، جلد 3، صص 11-17.
12. رضی، احمد .( 1391). «کارکردهای تعلیمی ادبیات فارسی،» پژوهشنامه اد بیات تعلیمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی دهاقان، س چهارم، ش پانزدهم، صص 120-90.
13. طاهری محمد, مومنی ثانی محمد(1390) «بررسی و تحلیل ویژگی های حماسی داستان بهرام چوبینه در شاهنامه فردوسی» پژوهش های ادب عرفانی ، ش1 (پیاپی 17) ; صص 175 - 196.
14. فردوسی، ابوالقاسم. (1386). شاهنامه فردوسی، به تصحیح جلال خالقی مطلق، دفتر سوم، تهران: مرکز دائره المعارف بزرگ اسلامی (مرکز پژوهش های ایرانی و اسلامی).
15. نظری منظم، هادی. (1389) «ادبیات تطبیقی: تعریف و زمینه های پژوهش ادبیات تطبیقی» (ادب و زبان نشریه دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی کرمان) : دوره 1 , ش 2 ; صص 221 - 237 .
16. یوسف پور محمدکاظم(1385) «مقایسه داستان بهرام چوبینه با تراژدی مکبث» نامه فرهنگستان دوره 8. ش 3 (پیاپی 31) ; صص 8 - 19.
Comparative Literature Research
Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 23
Winter 2020
Pages 132-153