low-wise properties of Ferdosi's belief based on Keykavus personality

Authors
1 Department of Psychology (Associate professor), Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Master of Art in Educational Psychology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
3 Department of Persian Language and Literature(Assistant Professor),Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract
Wisdom is a multi-dimensional concept, which includes a variety of issues such as knowledge, excitement, self- regulation, motivation, social function, moral and as well complex relationship between these aspects. The concept of wisdom influences on the way thinking, feeling and people's behavior in the life of texture. Therefore, wisdom should accrue in person's performance until it created positive effects for oneself and others. Because, a person that has only ideas of wise, but there is nothing from it in his behavior, that person is not wise. Therefore, aimed this study to investigate low-wise properties of Ferdosi's belief based on Key Kavus personality. This study was conducted based on the framework of quality approach. Statistical population of the research includes Ferdowsi's Shahnameh, which is selected using a meaningful sampling of Key Kavus personality a low- wise one. The context of Shahnameh was using content analysis and processes in clouding implementing, open coding and selective coding. The finding showed that low- wise properties include lack of religiosity and lack of morality, lack of thinking/ awareness, lack of facts perceptions and Subjectivism / Projection, lack of empathy/ affection and lack of experience gaining and lack of cultural values.

Keywords

Subjects


- Ardelt, M. (2003). Development and empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25, 275-324.
- Ardelt, M. (2011). The measurement of wisdom: A commentary on Taylor, Bates, and Webster’s com- parison of the SAWS and 3D-WS. Experimental Aging Research, 37(2), 241–255.
- Baltes, P. B. Staudinger. U.M. (1993). The search for a psychology of wisdom. Current Directionsin psychological scince, 2, 75-80.
- Brown, S. C. (2002). A model for wisdom development and its place in career services. Journal of Career Planning and Employment, 29-36.
- Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: International University Press.
- Jason, L. A, Reichler, A, King, C, Madsen, D, Camacho, J, and Marchese, W. (2001). The measurement of wisdom: A preliminary effort. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(5), 585-598.
- Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227-245.
- Sternberg, R. J. (A2008). Schools should nurture wisdom. In B. Z. Presseisen (Ed.), Teaching for intelligence (pp. 61-88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. 2nd ed.
- Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. Iternation of Aging and Human Development, 65(2) 163-183.
- Xin, MA.(1999). A Meta- analysic of the relationship between anxiety toword mathematics and achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Educ. 30(5): 520-540.
- Yang, S. Y. (2008). Real-life contextual manifestation of wisdom. Iternational Journal of Aging and Human Development, 67(4) 273-303.