Volume 1, Issue 2 (2013)
CLRJ 2013, 1(2): 71-91 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sedghi H, Sadr Ghaeni S A, Zare Dorniani I. A Comparative Study of Procedural Fairness in Persian and Arabic Literature. CLRJ 2013; 1 (2) :71-91
URL: http://clrj.modares.ac.ir/article-12-723-en.html
URL: http://clrj.modares.ac.ir/article-12-723-en.html
1- Professor, Department of Arabic Language & Literature, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2- M.A., Department of Arabic Language & Literature, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Arabic Language & Literature, Payam Noor University
2- M.A., Department of Arabic Language & Literature, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Arabic Language & Literature, Payam Noor University
Abstract: (16992 Views)
Chivalry and agility that is also translated as "generosity" have been very important phenomenon in the social history of Iran and surrounding countries and is a spiritual way of life that seems to have its roots in pre-Islamic Iran. They are divided into different categories that are called as ‘caliber’ and ‘brat’ in Persian and Arabic literature, respectively. Caliber was a group that had made ethics and campaign-specific career choice and self-indulgence and brat also defined as impoverished with no money, on the other hand people who had no interest in wealth and joined that house because of poverty and social imbalance. This study relying on comparative literature of American schools that merely doesn’t see the criteria existence of affect and affected attempt to make a comparative study of these two emerging fields within the common social and ethical implications. It seems that the main reason behind the formation of each of two groups was lack of community-based justice and social harmony. The most common social and moral characteristics of the two groups are: clemency; patience in the face of adversity, courage, generosity, support for the poor; combat skills including shooting, fighting, theft and robbery. This article also refers to common moral and social characteristics and examines the reasons behind the rise of the two groups.
Received: 2012/03/7 | Accepted: 2012/07/4 | Published: 2013/09/23
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |