Volume 2, Issue 1 (2014)
CLRJ 2014, 2(1): 99-134 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Karimifard G. Comparative Study of the Aesthetics of Amphibology in Persian and Arabic Rhetoric. CLRJ 2014; 2 (1) :99-134
URL: http://clrj.modares.ac.ir/article-12-5327-en.html
URL: http://clrj.modares.ac.ir/article-12-5327-en.html
Associate Professor, Department of Arabic Language & Literature,
Shahid Chamran University-Ahwaz, Ahwaz, Iran
Abstract: (12582 Views)
Amphibology, also called as equivocating, Fantasy and visualization, is accounted as one of the most worthwhile arts as well as one of the most artistic literature ornaments. In amphibology, the eloquent with employing high artistic skills generates different meaning paths in his/her verbal communication and makes some meaning expansion. Amphibology is also defined as using a language with double away and close difference meaning, in which the announcer discusses the away meaning; however, the auditors identify the close denotation. There are different types of amphibology; for instance, solitary (abstract or single) amphibology; disclosed amphibology, proportionally amphibology, antagonism amphibology, complex amphibology, double inverse proliferation amphibology, and … .
This paper tries to investigate the amphibology industry as well as the generation processes in the above mentioned different types. In same way we investigate the different amphibology classifications from eloquence point of view in Arabic and Persian languages.
Keywords: Amphibology, Equivocating, Difference types of amphibology, Eloquence in Arabic and Persian Language
Received: 2012/04/6 | Accepted: 2012/07/18 | Published: 2014/03/21
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |